Siddhartha Gautama |
In the Lotus Sutra,
after Shakyamuni has repeatedly explained that there is only one vehicle and
that the wisdom of the buddhas is difficult to understand and difficult to
enter, we come to the Ceremony in the Air.
A treasure tower arises from the ground and we meet Many Treasures Buddha
who confirms that what Shakamuni is saying is true. Everyone wonders who will spread this
teaching far and wide, and while various groups within the assembly offer to
propagate it, it’s only when the ground opens up and the Bodhisattvas of the
Earth (Shakyamuni’s students from previous lifetimes) appear that we see the
true disciples of the mentor Shakyamuni.
In the
March 2007 “Art of Living” magazine, Barbara Cahill explains that “Shakyamuni
himself established the way forward in the ceremony in the air when he passed
the baton of propagation to Bodhisattva Superior Practices and to the
Bodhisattvas of the Earth. At that point
he made it clear that practice to, and reverence for, the idealised image of a
remote and superior Buddha must be replaced by the understanding that the cause
for Buddhahood exists in every life.” (p37)
Throughout Shakyamuni’s life,
Shariputra and others saw themselves as the disciples of the Buddha, but after
the Buddha’s death, rather than propagate the Lotus Sutra, many of them
returned to the earlier teachings or started to revere Shakyamuni as a God. Akemi Baynes
explains “When
his followers lost the spirit of the oneness of mentor and disciple, Shakyamuni
became merely an object of worship, a godlike being, rather than a model of
what an enlightened person can achieve.”
(Art of Living, September 2007, p30-31)
In a dialogue on the Lotus Sutra between President Ikeda, and the Soka Gakkai Study Department chief and vice chiefs (published as “The Wisdom of the Lotus Sutra: Vol. IV”), they discuss India’s first prime minister’s opinion on why Buddhism died out In India:
Ikeda: [Jawaharlal Nehru, India's first prime minister] once discussed the
question of why Buddhism died out in India with the French author Andre
Malraux. … At one point in their
conversation, Nehru remarked: "The genius of the Buddha has to do with the
fact that he is a man. The originator of one of the most profound systems of
thought in the history of humanity, an inflexible spirit and the most noble
compassion. " … After Shakyamuni's death, however, as Nehru deftly
observed, "He became deified, he merged with that multitude, which closed
round him," in effect, eclipsing his human side. [Andre Malraux,
Anti-memoirs, trans. Terence Kilmartin (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston,
1968), p. 228.]
Saito: … The problem is
that as soon as Shakyamuni was deified, the path he had revealed for human
beings to attain enlightenment disappeared.
Ikeda: Yes.
Fundamentally, Buddhism is a teaching about how to live, a teaching transmitted
from mentor to disciple. … But if the Buddha as the mentor ceases to be a human
being and becomes a "god," then, practically speaking, the path of
mentor and disciple cannot exist. …
Saito: In Hinayana
Buddhism, which emerged relatively early after Shakyamuni's death, the people
gradually viewed Shakyamuni as a deity. Consequently they felt it was enough if they could just strive to
attain the enlightenment of persons of learning, or voice-hearers (i.e., the
stage of arhat). In Mahayana Buddhism,
other than the Lotus Sutra, which was systematized at a later time as a
countermovement to Hinayana, a large number of Buddhas are introduced besides
Shakyamuni Buddha. These include, for example, Amida, Mahavairochana and
Vairochana. But there is an unbridgeable gap between these Buddhas and actual people.
They are presented largely as beings to whom people can entrust their hopes for
salvation; not as potential mentors. Thus,
the path of mentor and disciple exists neither in the Hinayana nor in the
provisional Mahayana teachings.
Ikeda: When "Shakyamuni
the human being" was forgotten, Buddhism ceased to be a teaching about how
to live the best possible life. The path of mentor and disciple disappeared. Consequently, Buddhism declined and became
authoritarian.
Saito: When
followers fail to continue along the same path as the mentor, the very life of
Buddhism is extinguished. One cannot fail to be impressed by Nehru's wisdom in
discerning that Buddhism died out in India when Shakyamuni ceased to be viewed
as a human being.”
(Wisdom
of the Lotus Sutra: Vol. IV p30 – 33)
Saito: Because direct
contact with the Buddha was impossible, in time the concept of the "great
Buddha" took on a kind of life of its own. People thought that Shakyamuni
alone had attained the Buddha's enlightenment, and that it was far beyond them
to ever become Buddhas themselves.
Endo: The enlightenment
toward which they strove was the highest enlightenment of voice-hearers - the
stage of arhat. The state of the Buddha was seen as unattainable.
Suda: In the meantime,
the precepts gradually grew in complexity. Also, to maintain the order, the
monks created an air of mystery around their temples, going so far as to
expound teachings arrogating authority to themselves. At the same time, they placed the Buddha on a
pedestal rending him inaccessible to ordinary people.
Ikeda: Still, things
weren't quite as bad as they could have been as long as Shakyamuni's direct
disciples were around. The first compilation of sutras is said to have taken
place about a century after Shakyamuni's death. By then Shakyamuni's
deification may have already been fairly well advanced. …
Saito: The Sanskrit
term that, in the Chinese Buddhist canon, is translated as "World-Honored
One" is bhagavat, an ancient Indian literary term. This was apparently an
appellation that disciples used in addressing a teacher. But as Shakyamuni's
deification became solidified, people came to refer to him instead as the
"supreme deity" or as the "god of gods."
Amidha Buddha |
Suda: When we come to
Mahayana Buddhism, we find an emphasis on a personal Buddha as a
"savior" figure who leads people to enlightenment. … The problem is that as a result of this
Mahayana Buddhist movement, people came to make light of Shakyamuni, the
originator of Buddhism. Instead, they revered imaginary Buddhas [such as Amida,
Vairochana and Mahavairochana] as "gods." Ultimately, this closed off
the path whereby people could discover the "Law at one with the
Buddha" within their own lives.
Endo: Moreover, the
teaching of such Buddhas, rather than encouraging people to place importance on
their own inherent strength, only reinforced the tendency to depend on the
Buddha's compassion for salvation. The Pure Land or Nembutsu school of
Buddhism, in which people seek salvation through the benevolence of Amida
Buddha, is a case in point.
Ikeda: In short, both
the Hinayana and Mahayana teachings completely deviate from the spirit of Shakyamuni’s
teaching to make the Law and the self our foundation. … The Lotus Sutra’s
spirit is to resist the dehumanization
of religion and religion's tendency to become divorced from reality but instead
to steadfastly redirect religion to focus on the human being.
Suda: I recall the
Daishonin's declaration in "On Practicing the Buddha's Teachings"
that he has "[launched] the battle between the provisional and the true
teachings" and "the battle goes on even today" (WND1, p392). The
true legacy of Buddhism can be found only within unceasing spiritual struggle.
Saito: The Daishonin
constantly proclaimed: "Return to Shakyamuni!" …
Endo: He condemns as
utterly confused those who try to do away with the actual person Shakyamuni
while making much of imaginary Buddhas of uncertain origins. …
Ikeda: That suggests
just how strong the tendency of religion is to depart from the human being. And
when that happens, religion becomes little more than a means for controlling
people.
(Wisdom
of the Lotus Sutra: Vol. IV p44 – 48)
During this conversation, study department chief, Katsuji Saito also explains “[A]fter Shakyamuni's death the Law necessarily becomes fundamental. That is inevitable. The only way to attain Buddhahood is to have a direct connection with the Law and, in effect, make the Law one's mentor.” (Wisdom of the Lotus Sutra: Vol. IV p43)
And in “Buddhism Day by Day”, Daisaku Ikeda
writes, “The highest offering to the Buddha is not to worship something
reminiscent of the Buddha. Rather, it is to inherit the Buddha’s spirit.
In other words, the highest offering lies in struggling to manifest, as
one’s own way of life, even a part of the spirit of the Buddha, who upheld the
philosophy that everyone is a Buddha and tirelessly strove to save all from
suffering.” (p297)